Worth a closer look
Evidence key Strong Moderate Weak How we grade
Labeled fragrance allergen (EU) Skin allergen Scent ingredient
- What it can be used for
- Adds scent (the functions the EU ingredient database, CosIng, lists for it; a product may use it for any of them)
- CAS number
- 8006-64-2, 9005-90-7, 8052-14-0
Why it’s flagged
A fragrance allergen the EU requires companies to name on the label.
- Annex III entry 124; on labels from 2026 to 2028 (Regulation 2023/1545). Source: EU Cosmetics Regulation, Annex III (restricted)
Must be named on EU labels above 0.001% in leave-on and 0.01% in rinse-off products. Elsewhere, including the US, it can hide inside “fragrance”.
Classified as a skin sensitizer (may cause an allergic skin reaction).
- Skin Sens. 1 (H317). Source: EU CLP Regulation, Annex VI harmonized classification
EU hazard statement H317: may cause an allergic skin reaction.
Used to add scent: its official function is perfuming or fragrance.
- Listed functions: perfuming. Source: EU CosIng ingredient database
The EU ingredient database (CosIng) lists this ingredient's function as perfuming or fragrance, so it may be there to add scent, even on a label that never says “fragrance.”
What the research says
- History shows removing the exposure works: as industrial turpentine use fell from 94.5% of US supply as a solvent in 1935 to 4.5% in 1975, turpentine skin allergy declined with it. Moderate evidence. Karlberg & Lepoittevin 2021
- Once someone is sensitized, patch tests can trigger reactions at low ppm concentrations of oxidized terpene — but the specific 'as low as 1 ppm' figure is for Δ³-carene in older, narratively-reviewed occupational turpentine literature; for the two terpenes that dominate consumer exposure, modern peer-reviewed dose-response studies put the threshold one to two orders of magnitude higher (limonene hydroperoxides: ~24 ppm single patch application, ~140 ppm repeated realistic exposure, ED₁₀ ≈85 ppm; linalool hydroperoxides: ~560 ppm repeated realistic exposure). Weak evidence. Karlberg & Lepoittevin 2021
About ingredients flagged like this one:
- In a survey of 187 US pediatric personal-care products, preservatives (57.8% of products) were a more common source of contact allergens than fragrance (29.4%), even though the products were being screened specifically for hypoallergenic/fragrance-related marketing claims. Moderate evidence. Hamann 2015
Each finding shows its evidence grade. See every graded fact or how we grade.
Don’t want it on you or in your air? Look for “fragrance-free,” not “unscented.” An unscented product can still contain a masking fragrance. Why the words matter.
What this page can’t tell you
These lists describe what a substance can do, its hazard. The risk from one product depends on how much is in it and how you use it, and the label doesn’t say how much.
Not being on a list doesn’t make an ingredient safe. It may never have been assessed.
“Fragrance” or “parfum” on a label can hide this ingredient and many others. In the US, the individual chemicals in a fragrance are rarely named on the label.
Check your products
Check a whole labelProducts that list itEWG Skin DeepShop fragrance-free
“Products that list it” opens Open Beauty Facts, a free database anyone can edit.
Flagged the same way
Official lists checked September 2026. Spotted a mistake? Tell us.