Warning: this site contains 0% fragrance

The fragrance facts, graded

Don’t take our word for it. Here’s every fact on this site, with its evidence grade, its caveats, and a link to the source, so you can check us.

We start you on the strong ones: findings that have been replicated or come from one large, well-controlled study. Moderate and weak facts are here too, labeled for what they are. Use “Link to this fact” to share a single card.

3 facts match “perfume”

Children and pregnancy / Self-reported survey

In a US survey, boys and girls who used makeup or body products used fragrance products (perfume, cologne, body spray) at the same rate, about 31%.

Weak evidence.

Caveats

Scent-purpose products only; cleansers excluded, so not a fragrance-exposure prevalence. Indirect support for sex parity: in Melo 2020 (Brazil, 182/276 perfume users, 126 girls) at least 56/150 boys (≥37%) used perfume, so perfume is not a girls-only product; but the Brazilian level (66% of all children) is 3x the US level (≈21%), so the ~31% figure must not be generalized.

Source: Medley 2023 Link to this fact

Children and pregnancy / Self-reported survey

Children's lipstick, nail polish, and eyeshadow use was about the same in a Brazilian hospital survey and a US parent survey (roughly 19-22%, 22% and 11-13%), but perfume use was three times higher in Brazil (66% vs about 21%).

Weak evidence.

Caveats

Our cross-study arithmetic (Medley per-user rates re-based to all 312 children); different definitions ('perfume' vs 'fragrance products primarily for children'), ages (<=14 vs <=12) and sampling.

Source: Melo 2020, Revista Paulista de Pediatria Link to this fact

Children and pregnancy / Other evidence

In this cohort MEP, the urinary marker of the fragrance phthalate DEP, did not predict clinical-range behavior problems prenatally or postnatally (all 95% CIs include 1); it showed only uncorrected linear associations with ADHD-problems and pervasive-developmental-problems T-scores (coefficients 0.12-0.13), so the study gives no basis for a perfume-and-toddler-behavior claim.

Weak evidence: MEP is a product-use marker that cannot be separated from the fragrance mixture it travels with; one spot urine; the T-score signals are not corrected for 300 tests.

Source: Huang 2024, Toxics Link to this fact

Information, not medical advice. See also: myths we won’t tell you.